tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8774848724259616420.post5031419877587272737..comments2023-12-19T19:28:28.619-08:00Comments on Wealth is not the Problem: Science vs. Politics, Part 2HaynesBEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11263223513305886233noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8774848724259616420.post-77569989521115243232009-06-30T10:45:49.889-07:002009-06-30T10:45:49.889-07:00Burgess,
I loved the syllogism - perfect!
Beth,
...Burgess,<br /><br />I loved the syllogism - perfect!<br /><br />Beth,<br /><br />I did a post linking to this and quoting some of Reisman's post.<br /><br />Again, nice work bringing this argument to the fore.The Rat Caphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06641716225847901280noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8774848724259616420.post-76035896034948369322009-06-30T10:30:38.247-07:002009-06-30T10:30:38.247-07:00> "This fact in and of itself should make ...> "This fact in and of itself should make their 'scientific' conclusions suspect."<br /><br />Indeed, and the problem is not only pseudo-science, but pseudo-philosophy.<br /><br />Beth, thank you. Your brief post presents a radical challenge. If pro-reason advocates pick it up and use it, the environmentalists must answer--or reveal themselves as evaders.<br /><br />The challenge is to show how to complete this syllogism:<br /><br />1. The climate is changing.<br />2. <br />3. Therefore an increase in statism is needed.Burgess Laughlinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13865479709475171678noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8774848724259616420.post-15276579046836134312009-06-30T10:18:59.346-07:002009-06-30T10:18:59.346-07:00Beth,
Per your request, here is Dr. Reisman's...Beth,<br /><br />Per your request, here is Dr. Reisman's post in which he addresses this issue<br /><br />http://georgereisman.com/blog/2008/02/word-to-environmentalists.html#links<br /><br />Brilliant as usual. <br /><br />DougThe Rat Caphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06641716225847901280noreply@blogger.com