Tuesday, November 25, 2008

On Discourse

The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error.


--John Stuart Mill, philosopher and economist (1806-1873)



HT 3 Ring Binder.
.

Monday, November 24, 2008

Comfort, Money and Freedom

If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that, too.


-- W. Somerset Maugham(1874-1965)Source: Strictly Personal, 1941


from:
http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/W..Somerset.Maugham.Quote.2ECD

.

If Wealth Could be Free





and from --Thomas Sowell “It’s Priceless” Townhall.com Nov. 18, 2008

Wouldn't it be wonderful to live in a world where there were no prices? If you happened to want a Rolex or a Rolls-Royce, [or gasoline] you could just go get one-- or two if you wanted-- and not have to worry about ugly little things like price tags.

There is such a world. It is the world of political rhetoric. No wonder so many people are attracted to that world. It would be a great place to live.

Or would it?

Costs are not like that. You can ignore them all you want and they still won't go away. While you are enjoying all the goodies that politicians are sending your way, you may notice that your taxes are going up or that the money you earn or the money you have saved won't buy as much as it used to.

Costs that are passed on to businesses can get passed on again to their customers in higher prices. Money that the government prints to spend itself reduces the value of the money in your wallet or in your bank account.


And the costs he doesn't mention: the subversive effects of a growing sense of entitlement, the emergence of a "right" to live at the expense of others, the breeding of envy between producer and consumer, and the nurturing of resentment of those who have more by those who have less. When you disconnect the owning of wealth from the necessity of first earning or producing it, competition shifts away from the voluntary exchange of the market place into the realm of political coercion, thus destoying the means by which other people are a benefit instead of a threat to our lives.

Free trade brings peace and prospeity. "Free goods" require coercion which brings the opposite.


Sunday, November 23, 2008

Lessons from History

from The Panic of 1907 by Robert Bruner and Sean Carr:

In a Memorial Day speech at Indianapolis, President Theodore Roosevelt railed that the "predatory man of wealth" was the primary threat to private property in the United States:
One great problem that we have before us is to preserve the rights of property, and these can only be preserved if we remember that they are in less jeopardy from the Socialist and the Anarchist than from the predatory man of wealth. There can be no halt in the course we have deliberately elected to pursue, the policy of asserting the right of the nation, so far as it has the power, to supervise and control the business use of wealth, especially in the corporate form.

Progressive activism was reflected at the state level as well; various states passed legislation sharply limiting the prices railroads could charge passengers. Business analysts believed these prices yielded revenues below the costs necessary to provide the services, thus inducing downward pressures on stock prices. The Chronicle opined, "What is ailing the railroads and the stock market? ... The underlying cause is the same as it was at the time of the collapse in March, the same, indeed, as it has been for about a year and a half, during all of which period a shrinkage in values has been in progress. Owing to the assaults of those high in authority and adverse legislation both by Congress and the State legislatures, confidence is almost completely gone. No one is willing to buy at what appear like ridiculously low prices because no one can tell what the future may bring forth.

The initial judgment of knowledgeable observers was that the break in stock prices in March 1907 had been sparked by investor fears arising from the Roosevelt administration's aggressive attitude toward railroads and industrial corporations. "For a year we have been foretelling this catastrophe, an assured result of the trials railroad property, railroad men and other large capitalists have been forced to suffer," the Commercial and Chronicle said, commenting on a newly launched investigation E.H. Harriman's Union Pacific railroad. "What has just taken place is not the final scene. Hereafter, if the irritant is continued, as we presume it will be, it will not be so exclusively securities and security-holders that will suffer; all sorts of industrial affairs are sure to get involved.” That irritant, of course, was the president of the United States.

The book is worth reading for the details of events, but the analysis is incomplete. A better overall understanding of the Panic of 1907 would include a description of the regulatory restrictions in place at the time including the reserve requirements and the effects of their consequent pyramiding within the banking system, severe branching restrictions, and bond-collateral restrictions on currency issuance. (See Salsman, Richard "Bankers as Scapegoats for Government Created Banking Crises in U.S. History" in The Crisis in American Banking, ed. Lawrence H. White, NY University Press, 1993. Briefly reviewed here. For a more technical discussion focusing on the need for and use of currency substitutes, see Horwitz, Steven, "Competitive Currencies, Legal Restrictions, and the Origins of the Fed: Some Evidence from the Panic of 1907" here.)
.

Comic Relief: Everything's amazing, nobody's happy




HT TIA Daily